|
This poster was presented
at the 10th Annual Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research in
Toronto in June 2001.
Sexual behaviours of men in same-sex relationships:
Are monogamous men less at risk?
Mary Lou Miller,
Steve Martindale, Jacqueline M. O'Connell, Arn J. Schilder, Terry Trussler, Michael
Botnick, Keith Chan, Kevin J.P. Craib, Robert
S. Hogg.
View or download the
PDF file of the submitted abstract.
OBJECTIVES:
To compare sexual behaviours and socio-demographic characteristics
of young gay and bisexual men in monogamous and non-monogamous
same-sex relationships.
BACKGROUND:
Stable relationships have been advocated as a means of decreasing
sexual risk for HIV infection. However, research has shown that
although relationships are increasingly reported among MSM, monogamy
is not. Being in a relationship may lead to a generalized "denial"
of HIV risk.
METHODS:
Since May 1995, young gay and bisexual men aged 15 to 30 have
been recruited into an ongoing prospective study of HIV incidence
and risk behaviors in the Greater Vancouver region.
Information on relationship status, sexual behaviour and socio-demographic
characteristics were collected from self-administered questionnaires.
Contingency table and non-parametric methods identified factors
associated with being in a monogamous relationship or not. Multivariate
logistic regression models identified independent predictors of
relationship status. In multivariate models, all possible two-way
interactions were examined.
RESULTS:
Out of 462 participants, 216 (46.8%) reported
being in a same-sex relationship, or whom 83 (38.4%) described
their relationship as monogamous.
In addition to being more likely to have had casual sex partners
and to have had more casual partners in the past year,
participants in non-monogamous relationships were more likely
to have had unprotected anal insertive sex with casual partners
in the past year. As shown in Table 1, they were also more
likely to have been paid for sex, both in the past year and in
their lifetimes.
Marginally significant trends observed among monogamous men
suggest that they were more likely to have receptive anal sex
with a regular partner, and to do so without condoms. As
shown in Table 1, they were also less likely to have HIV
(0% vs. 4.6%; p=0.084).

No significant socio-demographic differences were observed
between the two groups. Men in non-monogamous relationships were
of course far more likely to have had a casual sex partner in
the past year. As shown in Table 2, the only other predictor
of non-monogamy was having ever been paid for sex (OR: 2.6; 95%
CI: 1.2-5.8).

LIMITATIONS:
As our questionnaire covers events transpiring in the previous
year, we are unable to determine whether casual sex encounters
among participants who report currently being in monogamous relationships
occurred before or during their current relationship.
CONCLUSIONS:
We found evidence of "negotiated safety" being practised
in our cohort, as men in monogamous relationships were marginally
more likely than those in non-monogamous relationships to have
unprotected anal sex with their regular partners.
Non-monogamous men are, of course, at risk for HIV through
their sexual activities with casual partners, both paid and unpaid.
Men who report being in monogamous relationships may, however,
have a false sense of security. The majority of the men in monogamous
relationships practised unprotected anal sex with their regular
partners, and as over a quarter of them also reported unprotected
insertive anal sex with casual partners in the past year,
some of these men may be unknowingly at risk for HIV within
their primary relationships.
As such, HIV prevention efforts should take into account the
complexities of negotiating terms of relationships.
REFERENCES:
1. Gruet
F, Dubois-Arber F. Evaluation of AIDS prevention among gay men
in Switzerland. Int Conf AIDS, 1993:816 (abstract no. PO-D06-3589).
2. Hoff
CC, McKusick L, Hilliard B, Ekstrand M, Coates TJ. Changes in
gay relationships before the AIDS epidemic and now. Int Conf
AIDS, 1992:D418 (abstract no. PoD 5186).
3. McKirnan
D, Doll L, Harrison J, et al. Primary relationships confer risk
for HIV exposure among gay men. Int Conf AIDS,1991:402 (abstract
no. M.D.4049).
4. Siva
C, Spink MJ, Veras MA, et al. Regular partnerships and perception
of risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men: an
elusive notion. Int Conf AIDS, 1998:220 (abstract no. 14190).
|